检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:于辉[1]
出 处:《中国生化药物杂志》2014年第3期171-173,177,共3页Chinese Journal of Biochemical Pharmaceutics
摘 要:目的研究采用液质联用法鉴定中药化学成分。方法用2种方法对86种中药的化学成分进行鉴定。观察组采用液质联用方法,对照组采用色谱法。对比2组鉴定方法的检测效果、准确率以及鉴定时间等。结果观察组优者占比76.74%(66/86),优良率为90.70%(78/86),均显著高于对照组(P<0.05)。观察组成功鉴定83例,成功率为96.51%,显著高于对照组(P<0.05)。观察组鉴定时长、校正后保留时间误差均显著少于对照组(P<0.05)。结论液质联用法鉴定中药化学成分准确率高,鉴定时间短,适应范围广。Objective To identify the chemical components of traditional Chinese medicine by liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry.Methods Chemical components of 86 traditional Chinese medicines were identified by two methods,observation group with LC-MS method and control group with traditional LC methods.The identification efficacy,accuracy,and identification time between two methods were compared. Results The excellent rate in observation group was 76.74% (66/86),the excellent and good rate was 90.70%(78/86),which were significantly higher than those in control group (P<0.05 ).83 kinds of traditional Chinese medicine were successfully identified in observation group,the success rate was 96.5 1%,significantly higher than control group(P<0.05).The identification tine,retention time after correction of errors in observation group were significantly less than control group(P<0.05 ).Conclusion LC-MS has high accuracy,short identification time and wide adaptation range in identification of chemical components of traditional Chinese medicine.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.42