LED蓝光治疗痤疮的临床观察  

Clinical Observation of LED Blue Light in the Treatment of Acne

作　　者：邓景航[1] 王菲[1] 高东好[1] 

机构地区：[1]广州市皮肤病防治所,广东广州510000

出　　处：《中国医疗美容》2014年第2期81-81,83,共2页China Medical Cosmetology

摘　　要：目的:探索研究LED蓝光治疗痤疮的临床效果。方法:观察组使用LED蓝光疗法与克林霉素凝胶共同治疗,对照组使用克林霉素凝胶进行治疗,观察两组的治疗效果。结果:通过对使用LED蓝光与克林霉素凝胶的观察组和使用克林霉素凝胶的对照组进行一个疗程的治疗,在使用LED蓝光与克林霉素凝胶的观察组的39例患者中,完全治愈的有19例,有效的为19例,无效的有1例,总有效率97.43%,在使用克林霉素凝胶的对照组的39例患者中,完全治愈的有11例,有效的为22例,无效的有6例,总有效率84.61%,两组在显效率及总有效率两方面比较差异显著(P<0.05),具有统计学意义,可以得出有LED蓝光治疗的观察组治疗效果比观察组好。结论:LED蓝光治疗痤疮值得临床推广。Objective:To explore the clinical effects of LED blue light in the treatment of acne. Methods:the observation group using the LED Blu ray therapy and Ciprofloxacin Hydrochloride Cream treatment, control group using Ciprofloxacin Hydrochloride Cream treatment, observe the treatment effect of the two groups. Results:Through the observation of the use LED blue light and clindamycin gel group and control group use clindamycin gel for a course of treatment, in the use of LED blue and clindamycin gel group of 39 cases, completely cured in 19 cases, effective for 19 cases, ineffective in 1 case, the total effective rate was 97.43%; In the use of clindamycin gel with a control group of 39 cases, completely cured in 11 cases, effective in 22 cases, ineffective in 6 cases, total effective rate 84.61%, two groups in the two aspects of efficiency and total effective rate was significant difference (P<0.05), statistically significant, can draw has LED blue light treatment group therapy effect is better than the observation group. Conclusion:LED blue light in the treatment of acne is worth the clinical promotion.

关 键 词：LED蓝光 痤疮 克林霉素凝胶 

分 类 号：R758.733[医药卫生—皮肤病学与性病学]