WellFlo与PIPESIM管流关系式预测结果对比分析  

Comparative Analysis on Predicted Results of Multiphase-flow Relationships in WellFlo and PIPESIM

作　　者：朱国[1] 钟海全[2] 刘兴国[1] 

机构地区：[1]中石化西南油气分公司川东北采气厂,四川阆中637400 [2]西南石油大学油气藏地质及开发工程国家重点实验室,成都610500

出　　处：《重庆科技学院学报（自然科学版）》2013年第3期150-153,共4页Journal of Chongqing University of Science and Technology：Natural Sciences Edition

基　　金：四川省自然科学基金项目(51104125)

摘　　要：根据误差分析方法建立多相管流关系式综合评价模型,该模型包含了3个衡量误差的性能指标。利用中海油锦州地区、渤中地区及平湖地区116井次实测数据分别对WellFlo和PIPESIM软件多相管流关系式进行评价,并对其预测结果进行对比分析,结果表明:依据各地区性能最佳的关系式比较,PIPESIM较WellFlo软件管流关系式预测结果略好;但从排在前9位的WellFlo软件均占6位看,WellFlo软件管流关系式预测结果较PIPESIM软件略好。Based on error analysis,the comprehensive evaluation model of multiphase pipe-flow correlations is presented.It contains 3 performance indexes to weight error.By means of the 116 sets of tested data in Jinzhou,Bozhong and Pinghu areas,the paper has carried respectively on evaluation on the multiphase pipe-flow correlations of WellFlo and PIPESIM.On this basis,the comprehensive comparative analysis of multiphase pipe-flow correlations of two softwares is carried,the results show that according to the number of best correlations,PIPESIM is better a bit than WellFlo.However,both in the Jinzhou,Bozhong and Pinghu areas,the 6 correlations in the forer 9 belong to WellFlo,therefore WellFlo is slightly better than PIPESIM from this point.

关 键 词：WellFlo PIPESIM 多相管流 评价 对比分析 

分 类 号：TP317[自动化与计算机技术—计算机软件与理论]