检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:翟亚辉[1] 马蓉丽[2] 成妍[2] 吴海涛[2] 张光星[1]
机构地区:[1]山西农业大学园艺学院,山西太谷030801 [2]山西省农业科学院蔬菜研究所,山西太原030031
出 处:《华北农学报》2013年第6期115-120,共6页Acta Agriculturae Boreali-Sinica
基 金:国家公益性行业(农业)科研专项(20090318-7-3);山西省自然科学基金项目(2011011029-1)
摘 要:利用RAPD和SSR方法研究了37份洋葱种质资源间的遗传多样性,并对这2种分子标记方法进行了比较。结果表明,从15个RAPD引物中,检测到61条有多态性的带;利用筛选出的8对SSR引物,检测到41条多态性带;RAPD和SSR标记均有很高的多态性,RAPD多态性带所占比例为84.7%,SSR位点检测出的平均有效等位基因数为3.75;SSR标记的有效等位基因数、Nei's基因多样性指数及Shannon信息指数的平均值均高于RAPD标记。UPGMA聚类分析表明,2种标记均可将37份洋葱种质资源划分为四大类,聚类结果相似。RAPD和SSR标记均适于洋葱种质的遗传多样性研究,但SSR标记效果较好。In this paper,the genetic diversity of 37 onions(Allium cepa L.) germplasm resources were analyzed by SSRs and RAPDs markers and the results of these two methods were compared .The results showed that 61 poly-morphic bands were detected by 15 RAPD primers and 41 polymorphic bands were detected by 8 SSR primers .Both RAPDs and SSRs were highly polymorphic .The percentage of polymorphic RAPDs bands was 84 .7%.The average effective number of alleles was 3.75 for SSRs.The average effective number of alleles ,Nei′s genetic diversity index , Shannon information index for SSRs markers were higher than those in RAPDs .UPGMA cluster analysis indicated that both the two markers could divided 37 germplasm into four groups and the classification were fundamentally i-dentical .The study suggested that both RAPDs and SSRs could be used to analyze the genetic diversity of onion germplasm resources ,but the effect for SSRs marker was better than RAPDs .
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.181