2种术式治疗腹股沟疝的对比  

Traditional Operation Compared to Mesh Plug Hernia Repair in Treatment of Inguinal Hernia

作　　者：吴建军[1] 韦建军[1] 庞建[1] 胡峰[1] 

机构地区：[1]成都市第六人民医院,四川成都610051

出　　处：《现代临床医学》2013年第6期424-425,427,共3页Journal of Modern Clinical Medicine

摘　　要：目的:比较传统疝修补术与无张力疝修补术治疗腹股沟疝的临床效果。方法:回顾性分析传统疝修补术与无张力疝修补术治疗43例腹股沟疝的临床资料,比较2组手术相关指标。结果:与传统疝修补术组相比,无张力疝修补术组患者手术时间短、术后恢复快、术后疼痛轻、并发症少、复发率低(P<0.05)。结论:无张力疝修补术治疗腹股沟疝优于传统疝修补术,是一种安全有效的方法。Objective: To evaluate the clinical effects of traditional operation and Mesh plug hernia Repair in treatment of inguinal hernia. Methods: The clinical data of 23 patients with the inguinal hernia were retrospectively reviewed. including 20 cases treated with traditional operation,and 12 cases treated with Mesh plug hernia Repair. Results: All patients were rehabilitated smoothly,There were remarkable differences in operational time,postoperative recovery,complication between the two groups( P < 0. 05). Conclusion: Mesh plug hernia repair is more effective than traditional operation. It is an effective method in performing herniorraphy and suould be deserved and popularized.

关 键 词：腹股沟疝 传统疝修补术 无张力疝修补术 

分 类 号：R656.2+1[医药卫生—外科学]