检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:刘俊祥[1]
机构地区:[1]武汉大学政治与公共管理学院
出 处:《学术前沿》2013年第14期40-53,共14页Frontiers
摘 要:权力和真理,一般包括权力掌控真理、真理掌控权力和权力与真理相互包容三类关系状态。权力掌控真理,强权即公理,会产生真理性权力和强权政治,必然导致专制暴政。真理掌控权力,真理权力化,也容易导致理性的自负和专横。因此,权力与真理间关系的恰当模式,应该是权力与真理在民主基础上的合作互助,对权力性真理和真理性权力进行法治规制,将真理性权力和权力性真理都关进法治的笼子里。这样,既可避免理性的自负,也能避免权力的滥用。Generally speaking, power and truth encompass three types of relations or status: power controls truth, truth controls power, and power and truth are mutually inclusive. For the first one, it means might is right and results in truth authority and power politics, which will inevitably lead to tyranny and dictatorship. For the second, it imbues truth with power, which may easily cause rational conceit and tyranny, too. Therefore, the proper relationship between power and truth should be their cooperation on the basis of democracy. Both the truth-based power and the power-based truth should be locked up in the 'cage' of law and be subject to lawful restriction. In this way, rational conceit and abuse of power can be avoided.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.7