检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]装甲兵工程学院,北京100072
出 处:《系统仿真学报》2013年第S1期244-248,共5页Journal of System Simulation
摘 要:针对目前作战指挥决策仿真模型中多采用的规则推理方式存在知识获取瓶颈和推理效率低下的不足,在分析坦克分队作战指挥决策内容和流程的基础上,提出采用案例推理(Case-Based Reasoning,CBR)为主,规则推理(Rule-Based Reasoning,RBR)为辅的综合推理模式进行坦克分队作战指挥决策的仿真,构建了基于CBR-RBR综合推理的决策仿真框架,并对坦克分队作战指挥决策仿真进行了实现,验证了CBR-RBR决策仿真的有效性和合理性。The existing operational command decision-making models mostly adopt rule-based reasoning to simulate the whole decision-making process in battle,which is associated with knowledge acquisition limitation and inefficient reasoning.On the basis of analyzing the current content and flow of tank-unit combat command decision,a decision-making simulation framework based on CBR-RBR integrated reasoning was proposed,which made an implement of tank-unit combat command decision-making simulation using this method.The simulation of tank-battalion combat command decision-making was applied to a simulation system.The simulation results preliminarily verify that the CBR-RBR decision-making simulation method is effective and reasonable.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.217.178.138