检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:童立元[1] 涂启柱[2] 杜广印[1] 蔡国军[1]
机构地区:[1]东南大学岩土工程研究所,江苏南京210096 [2]中铁第四勘察设计院集团有限公司,湖北武汉430063
出 处:《岩土工程学报》2013年第S2期569-572,共4页Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering
基 金:国家自然科学基金项目(40702047)
摘 要:回顾了采用孔压静力触探(CPTU)测试参数确定压缩模量(Es)的现有方法,并在江苏选择3个高速公路软土场地进行了CPTU试验,以高质量原状土样固结试验得到的Es值作为参考值评估了各经验方法的预测有效性,进而提出了新的江苏典型软土锥尖阻力–压缩模量Es相关关系;同时采用不同CPTU测试参数计算的Es值预测了某条高速公路软基的沉降量,并和现场沉降观测值进行了比较,结果表明:基于净锥尖阻力qn的Senneset(1989)方法能够很好的预测Es值;同样,基于CPTU测试参数预测的高速公路软基沉降量也接近于现场实测沉降,验证了应用CPTU确定软土Es值进而预测软基沉降的可靠性。The existing interpretation methods for piezocone penetration tests(CPTU) are reviewed for prediction of the constrained compression modulus(Es). Three expressway sites in Jiangsu Province are selected for this study. In each site, CPTU tests are performed supplemented by consolidation tests using high-quality undisturbed soft soil samples. Then, Es-predicted methods based on the CPTU tests are compared and evaluated. The new correlations are also developed to predict the values of Es from the cone tip resistance(qc), corrected cone tip resistance(qt) and net cone tip resistance(qn) for soft clay in Jiangsu Province. Furthermore, the correlations are verified by comparing the total settlements predicted from CPTU and the measured settlements for one selected expressway site. The results show that the Senneset et al(1989)method based on the net cone resistance is able to predict Es better than the other methods. The predicted total settlements based on CPTU parameters show a better agreement with the measured ones. Accordingly, the reliability of the application of CPTU for Es and settlement prediction is verified.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.249