检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
出 处:《岩土工程学报》2013年第S2期680-683,共4页Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering
基 金:国家自然科学基金项目(51079030);国家科技支撑计划项目(2011BAG07B01);国家重点基础研究发展计划(973计划)项目(2013CB036304)
摘 要:为了深入研究砂桩复合地基加固体系的承载力、沉降及破坏机理,通过自行研发的可视化模型试验装置,对砂桩单桩、群桩复合地基进行了2组室内模型试验,并进行了1组钢管桩单桩复合地基对比试验,获得了砂桩复合地基的荷载–沉降、桩土应力比、沉降–时间及桩土应力比–时间数据。试验结果分析表明:钢管桩单桩复合地基与砂桩单桩复合地基相比,其承载力低,且桩顶应力集中现象明显;砂桩群桩复合地基总沉降量小,承载力高,沉降及桩土应力比时间效应显著,桩体置换作用明显,充分发挥了桩间土的承载特性。To deeply study the bearing capacity, settlement and failure mode mechanism of composite foundation with sand piles, single and group sand piles composite foundations with as well as contrast tests on the composite foundation with steel pipe piles are performed. designed and carried out in the laboratory model tests. The data about the load-settlement, pile-soil stress ratio, settlement-time and pile-soil stress ratio-time are obtained. The results show that the bearing capacity of the composite foundation with single steel pipe pile is lower, and the stress concentration on the pile top is more obvious, compared with that of the composite foundation with single sand pile. The composite foundation with group sand piles is of low settlement, high bearing capacity, significant time effect of settlement and pile-soil stress ratio, obvious pile replacement and full improvement of the bearing capacity of the soils between piles.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.112