“彻底的解释”可能吗?——基于戴维森解释理论构建要素的分析  

Is "Radical Interpretation" Possible?——Based on the Analysis of its Building Elements

作　　者：梁义民[1] 

机构地区：[1]湛江师范学院法政学院

出　　处：《浙江社会科学》2013年第11期104-109,97+158,共8页Zhejiang Social Sciences

基　　金：国家社会科学基金后期资助项目(12FZX028);教育部人文社会科学规划基金一般项目(12YJA72040002)

摘　　要：彻底的解释是戴维森试图为其真之语义论提供的一种经验解释或验证方案,其基本思路是,彻底的解释者利用现存的有限资源,基于宽容原则由环境引起的说话者的持真态度,推知说话者的持真语句为真,进而仿照决策论对说话者的言语行为及其表达提供一种适当的解释。然而,彻底的解释寻求的解释突破口——说话者的持真态度不可行,贯彻的基本原则——宽容原则不可靠,诉诸的现存资源不奏效,这些构建要素面临的困境表明该方案的不可能,戴维森以此构筑真之语义论的经验防线的设想难以成真。Radical interpretation was an empirical interpretation or verification that Davidson tried to provide for his semantic theory of truth,and its basic idea was that a radical interpreter took advantages of existing limited resource,and basing on the principle of charity,inferred the speaker's holdtrue sentences to be true from his hold-true attitude,thus provided a proper interpretation for the speaker's verbal behaviors and expressions following the decision theory.However,the interpretative breakthrough,namely the speaker's hold-true attitude,sought by the radical interpretation was infeasible,the basic principle,namely the principle of charity,carried through the entire project was unreliable,and the existing resources for resort did not work.These dilemmas,with which the component factors faced,indicated that the project was impossible,and Davidson's assumption about empirical line of defense built for his semantic theory of truth was difficult to come true.

关 键 词：彻底的解释 持真态度 宽容原则 T-语句 戴维森 

分 类 号：B81-0[哲学宗教—逻辑学]