检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]杭州电子科技大学经济学院,浙江杭州310018 [2]上海财经大学人文学院,上海200433
出 处:《杭州电子科技大学学报(社会科学版)》2013年第4期53-58,共6页Journal of Hangzhou Dianzi University:Social Sciences
基 金:浙江省自然科学基金项目(Y6110803);浙江省哲学社会科学规划课题(12JCFX04YB);杭州电子科技大学高教研究课题(YB1149)
摘 要:如何处理搁置成本是多个国家发电业管制改革棘手问题,也是我国深化电力管制难题。搁置成本产生于电力管制改革这一特定背景,其回收离不开效率与公正双重考量。隐性契约理论在适用上解释力不足,《宪法》、《物权法》、《行政许可法》和《电力法》规范奠定了回收搁置成本合法性、合理性、可行性制度基础,应当创新搁置成本回收法律路径。It is a Gordian knot to dispose the stranded cost for the regulation reform of power generating industry in many countries,and it is also a difficult problem in the power regulation reform in China. The stranded cost originates from the reform of the power regulation; its recoveries should be examined from the aspects of both efficiency and fairness. The implied contract theory is of an insufficient explanation in application. Constitutional Law,Property Law,Law of Administrative Licensing and Electricity Law lay a solid foundation for the recovery of the stranded cost's validity,rationality and feasibility. Therefore the legal approach of recovering the stranded cost should be innovated.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.28