检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]中国煤炭科工集团重庆设计研究院,重庆400016
出 处:《地下空间与工程学报》2013年第S2期2072-2075,共4页Chinese Journal of Underground Space and Engineering
摘 要:基于采用岩体等效内摩擦角法计算岩石侧压力的结果偏大,通过分析计算方法存在的问题及其计算结果偏大的原因后,提出无外倾结构面时岩石侧压力应由采用岩体等效内摩擦角按侧向土压力方法计算值减去岩体破裂角与等效内摩擦角间岩石侧压力沿规范计算值方向分力获得,分析了本文计算方法的合理性及经济性。研究结果表明,直立切坡采用文中的计算方法可以减小岩石侧压力约1.6%~16.6%;岩体破裂角及其与等效内摩擦角间差值越大,减小工程造价越多,减小工程造价的程度越明显。新的计算方法具有安全性和一定的经济性。It is too large for the result of lateral rock pressure calculated by method of equivalent internal friction angle. After analyzing the problem in calculation method and the reason of too large result,this paper puts forward that the lateral rock pressure should be the result of calculation by method of equivalent internal friction angle minus the component force along the calculated value direction by code of the lateral rock pressure of rock between break angle and equivalent internal friction angle when there was no extraversion structural surface. And the rationality and economy of the new calculation method were validated by theoretical analysis. The results show that the lateral rock pressure can be reduced about by 1. 6% ~ 16. 6% with the new calculation method in vertical slope. And the rock pressure or the difference between rock pressure and equivalent internal friction angle were larger,the decreases of project cost and the extent of project cost decreasing were more. This new method is safe with certain economic benefits.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.117.180.237