检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
出 处:《四川中医》2013年第8期82-83,共2页Journal of Sichuan of Traditional Chinese Medicine
摘 要:目的:观察、比较非手术外固定与手术内固定在治疗多发性肋骨骨折的疗效。方法:随机分为两组,非手术外固定组和手术内固定组,统计分析比较两组治疗后疼痛时间、住院时间、住院费用、康复时间、治疗满意度等比较。结果:两组治疗疗效经统计分析差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),主要统计项比较,治疗组较对照组更明显(P<0.01)。结论:非手术外固定组与手术内固定组比较有明显疗效优势。Observed,compared with non-surgical and surgical fixation and external fixation in the treatment of multiple rib fractures.Methods: Patients were randomly divided into two groups,external fixation group of non-surgical and surgical fixation group.Statistical analysis and comparison of the two groups after the treatment of pain,hospitalization time,hospitalization costs,recovery time,treatment satisfaction and other more.Results: Therapeutic efficacy of the two groups after statistical analysis,the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05),the main statistical comparison,the treatment group than the controlled group significantly(P<0.01).Conclusion: Non-operation external fixation group has better effect than internal fixation group.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.3