检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:陶文钊[1]
机构地区:[1]中国社会科学院 和平与发展研究中心
出 处:《和平与发展》2014年第6期23-42,113-114+117-129,共20页Peace and Development
摘 要:在美国有一种几乎是原教旨主义的看法:美国是一个海洋国家,中国是一个大陆国家。美国把中国建设海洋强国的目标视为对其在西太平洋主导地位的挑战。双方在东海与南海问题上存在着尖锐的分歧。在东海,美国把钓鱼岛问题上的战略模糊转变为战略清晰。在南海,美国极力推动争议的多边化、国际化。但这并不是说,两国在西太平洋就没有调和的余地,这种竞争必然导致战略摊牌。There is an almost fundamentalist view in the US, which believes that the US is a traditional sea power and China a traditional continental power. The US has been very sensitive in seeing China's strategy to become a sea power as challenges to its hegemony in the Western Pacific. There are sharp differences between China and the US over the issues of East China Sea and South China Sea. On the East China Sea issue, the US has changed its strategic ambiguity to strategic clarity. On the South China Sea issue, the U.S. is pushing hard to promote the multilateralization and internationalization of South China Sea disputes. But that does not mean there is no room for the two sides to accommodate in the Western Pacific and that their competition will inevitably lead to a strategic showdown.
关 键 词:“陆海分治” 中日钓鱼岛争端 南海问题 中美竞争与顺应 “亚太再平衡”战略 《日美安保条约》
分 类 号:D822.371.2[政治法律—政治学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.217.252.20