全息:传统纠纷解决机制的现代启示  

Holography:Modern Implications of Traditional Mechanism of Dispute Resolution

作　　者：郭星华[1,2] 李飞[3,4] 

机构地区：[1]中国人民大学社会学理论与方法研究中心 [2]中国人民大学法律社会学研究所,教授100872 [3]中国人民大学社会学系 [4]日本爱知大学中国研究院,博士研究生100872

出　　处：《江苏社会科学》2014年第4期123-130,共8页Jiangsu Social Sciences

基　　金：教育部人文社科重点研究基地重大课题<传统文化与现代法治>(11JJD840005);北京郑杭生社会发展基金会.杭州国际城市学研究中心子项目<农村流动人口与同城化研究--以社会动员为视角>(13ZHFD07)的阶段性成果

摘　　要：熟人社会有大量的初级关系,也就会有初级纠纷产生。如果初级纠纷无法得到及时解决,就有可能演变成次级纠纷,继而形成新的紧张和激烈程度更高的次级纠纷。在现代社会的语境下,法治基本只关注"此时此地"的次级纠纷,但有时并未使这些纠纷得到彻底的解决,也随之埋下了将来发生更大纠纷的隐患。然而,反观传统社会在处理纠纷时所遵循的还原纠纷"全息"的过程,在修补初级关系的同时,尽可能防止发生新的次级纠纷有一定的现实意义,因此我们认为,传统社会的纠纷解决方式无疑对现代社会有一个很好的启示作用。There are much preliminary relationships in the society of acquaintances, where prelimi-nary disputes occur. If a preliminary dispute has not been solved, it can develop into a secondary dispute, which will become more intense and fierce. In modern society, rule-of-law just focuses on the secondary dispute under the present circumstances, but it cannot be solved completely sometimes. As a result, more serious disputes are likely to be caused. However, in traditional society, the dispute could be solved by means of returning to dispute holography, which would fix up preliminary relationships as well as avoiding subsequent secondary disputes. Therefore, the mechanism of dispute resolution in traditional society has implications for today.

关 键 词：全息 初级纠纷 次级纠纷 调解 

分 类 号：D920.0[政治法律—法学]