民初大理院刑事司法创制探颐  

On the criminal judicial creation of the early Republic of China

作　　者：施玮[1] 

机构地区：[1]巢湖学院经管法学院,安徽合肥238000

出　　处：《中南大学学报（社会科学版）》2014年第6期154-159,共6页Journal of Central South University：Social Sciences

基　　金：安徽省教育厅人文社会科学重点研究项目"民国时期刑事司法创制研究"(SK2013A117)

摘　　要：北洋政府时期,刑事审判法律相对稳定然而并不完备,导致刑事审判法律渊源的多元化。为了有效适用法律,维护刑事审判的公正,作为最高审判机关的大理院通过司法创制的形式确立了大量判例和解释例,成为这一时期刑事案件审判的重要法律依据。这种体现司法权本质的司法创制具有拘束个案的效力,并起到统一法律的作用,具有相当的权威性。In the period of the early period of the Republic of China, the criminal trial law was relatively stable but not complete, so the sources of criminal trial law was plural. In order to make the law effective and maintain fair, the then Daliyuan, as the highest judicial organ, used its power of interpretation, and established a large number of precedents and interpretation cases, which became important legal basis in this period. This is an authoritative criminal judicial creation which reflected the nature of the jurisdiction with effect and played the role of uniform law.

关 键 词：大理院 刑事法 司法创制 判决例 解释例 

分 类 号：D909.2[政治法律—法学理论]