检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:王燃[1]
出 处:《国家检察官学院学报》2015年第2期155-170,176,共17页Journal of National Prosecutors College
基 金:国家社会科学基金青年项目"信息化时代庭审方式变迁的实证研究"(12CFX051)阶段性成果
摘 要:美国庭审直播始于20世纪前期,距今已有近百年的历史。在发展过程中关于其利弊的争议从未停止过,支持者认为其能够提高司法透明度,促进司法正义;反对者则认为庭审直播会干扰庭审秩序,侵犯被告人的正当程序权。美国司法史上不乏与庭审直播有关的著名案例,目前联邦法院对庭审直播仍然持比较保守的态度,不过各州法院对其态度已经较为开放。随着近年网络技术、即时通信技术的发展,庭审直播的设备和方式也在悄然变化,网络直播、微博直播、博客直播等方式逐渐兴起,如何对新技术下庭审直播进行法律规制也是目前需要面对的问题。American courtroom broadcasting can be traced to the early 20 th century,which has a history of nearly a century. Disputes about its pros and cons never stopped during its development. Supporters say it can improve the judicial transparency,and promote the judicial justice,while opponents think courtroom broadcasting interferes with the trial order,infringe the defendant's right to due process. There are numerous cases about courtroom broadcasting in American legal history. Nowadays,federal courts still hold conservative attitude to courtroom broadcasting,in the meanwhile the district courts welcome courtroom broadcasting.Recently,with the development of network technology and instant communications technology,the device and pattern of courtroom broadcasting also change a lot. With the trend of webcast,micro- blogging of the trial,how to regulate the courtroom broadcasting under the background of new technology is also an urgent problem. In order to provide experience and inspiration to the establishment of courtroom broadcasting in China,this paper introduces the development of American courtroom broadcasting.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.3