检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]中山大学环境科学与工程学院广东省环境污染控制与修复技术重点实验室,广州510275 [2]中山大学环境科学研究所,广州510275
出 处:《环境工程》2015年第3期50-55,共6页Environmental Engineering
基 金:广东省自然科学基金团队项目(06202438);国家自然科学基金(30600011;50779080)
摘 要:将水生植物材料(凤眼莲叶和茎、大薸叶)作为新型吸油材料,与传统植物材料(水稻秸秆、夏威夷坚果壳、甘蔗渣)的吸油性能进行比较。通过研究各材料的表面结构特征、表面基团特征、吸油能力和表面疏水性,来对比各材料的吸油性能。结果表明:水生植物材料具有较大吸油容量,且其叶子部分疏水性很强,适合作为水上浮油原位处理的吸附剂;水稻秸秆疏水性稍弱,但也是一种良好的水上浮油吸附剂;凤眼莲茎吸水性较强,与夏威夷坚果壳、甘蔗渣一样具有浮力较小、疏水性较弱的特点,但对正己烷的吸附速率非常快,可考虑作为填充滤料处理含油废水。As a new type of oil sorbent,the oil sorption capacity of hydrophyte materials( Eichhornia crassipes stem and leaf,Pistiastratiotes leaf) were compared with traditional vegetable sorbents( rice straw,Hawaii nut shell and sugarcane bagasse).Surface characteristics,functional group properties,oil sorption capacity and superficial hydrophobicity of each material were studied. The results showed that: Hydrophyte materials had larger oil sorption capacity and their leaves were highly hydrophobic,thus they were ideal oil sorbents for in-situ treatment. Hydrophobicity of rice straw was comparatively weaker,but it was also a good oil sorbent. Eichhornia crassipes stem was highly hydrophilic,and as smaller buoyancy and weaker hydrophobicity,similar to Hawaii nut shell and sugarcane bagasse. In addition,it could adsorb hexane fast and be used as filler materials in oily wastewater treatment.
分 类 号:X505[环境科学与工程—环境工程]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.229