学术权力与行政权力冲突的制度求解——基于23所大学的章程文本分析  

Institutional Resolution of Conflicts Between Academic Power and Administrative Power——Based on the Comparisons of Twenty-three University Statutes in China

作　　者：肖磊[1] 石卫林[1,2] 

机构地区：[1]中国石油大学(北京)规划处 [2]中国石油大学(北京)高等教育研究所

出　　处：《教育学术月刊》2015年第2期62-67,共6页Education Research Monthly

基　　金：北京市教育科学"十二五"规划2013年度一般课题"大学章程关于学术权力制约机制的规定--基于章程文本的比较"(课题编号:DDB13099)

摘　　要：截至2014年7月,教育部相继核准了中国人民大学等23所大学的章程。这些大学章程的颁布,是否从制度设计层面上推动了学术权力与行政权力的冲突化解?体现在哪些方面?通过比较分析这23所大学的章程文本,发现:行政权力越位的潜在空间极大,弱防范性规制制度存在的院校极少、作用范围单一或模糊,弱协调性规制制度存在的院校极多,作用范围极广。尽管通过大学章程来缓解学术权力与行政权力的冲突极其困难,但是,弱防范性和弱协调性规制制度的存在,表明学术权力与行政权力的冲突正在通过大学章程制度的建立逐步走向缓解。The Ministry of Education has authorized twenty-three University Statutes by July 2014. Have these enacted university statutes resolved the conflicts between academic power and administrative power from the institutional level? And how did they embody?The results of this paper are based on the comparisons of these university statutes. And we discover that the offside of administration power has large potential space. Furthermore, the weak preventive constraints exist in very few institutions and the influential scope is very narrow, while weak coordinative constraints exist in many institutions and the influential scope is very wide.The results suggest that it be difficult to resolve the conflicts between academic power and administrative power through the establishment of the University Statutes. However, the existence of weak preventive constraints and weak coordinative constraints suggest that the conflicts relieve through the establishment of the University Statutes.

关 键 词：防范性 协调性 大学章程 学术权力 行政权力 文本分析 现代大学制度 

分 类 号：G647[文化科学—高等教育学]