检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]暨南大学金融研究所与金融系 [2]中信银行广州分行
出 处:《金融论坛》2015年第2期24-30,37,共8页Finance Forum
基 金:国家自然科学基金资助项目(71272213)"货币政策波动;信贷资源配置及其经济后果研究"的阶段性成果
摘 要:本文基于货币政策的研究视角,利用中国上市公司2002~2012年的相关数据,结合考虑公司产权性质,研究不同货币政策环境下负债融资对股权代理成本的影响。研究发现:负债融资在紧缩货币政策下能有效减少股权代理成本,但与非国有上市公司相比,由于国有上市公司存在预算软约束和监督激励机制不完善等问题,负债融资抑制股权代理成本的效果在这些公司上较差;同时,短期负债降低股权代理成本的效果好于长期负债。因此,在紧缩性货币政策下,公司应调整融资结构,适当提高负债融资比例,特别是短期负债融资的比例,以降低股权代理成本,提升公司价值。From the perspectives of monetary policy and the nature of property rights of company, this paper researches the influence of debt financing on equity agency costs in different environment of monetary policy. It's found that debt financing can effectively reduce equity agency costs while tightening monetary policy is implemented, but due to the soft-budget-constraint and the imperfect supervision and incentives mechanisms, the effect of reducing equity agency costs in the state-owned listed companies is not good compared with the non-state-owned listed companies; meanwhile, the effect of short-term debt on reducing equity agency costs is better than that of long-term debt. Therefore, while tightening monetary policy is implemented, companies should adjust financing structure, namely increasing the ratio of debt financing, especially the ratio of short-term debt financing, so as to reduce equity agency costs and increase company value.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.62