检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]清华大学社科学院科技与社会研究所,北京100084
出 处:《科普研究》2015年第2期12-20,共9页Studies on Science Popularization
基 金:中国博士后科学基金项目(2014M550044)
摘 要:本文主要从宏观上对比中美两国主要报纸上有关PM2.5的新闻,并以《人民日报》和《纽约时报》为例,比较两报历年来PM2.5新闻在报道数量、报道内容、报道体裁、新闻来源的异同,来反映中国环境新闻的现状和不足,总结美国环境新闻报道的经验,以资我们借鉴。发现两国关于PM2.5新闻有着不同的报道模式、不同的报道领域侧重、不同的重点报道体裁和不同的主要新闻来源。认为中国环境新闻存在着科技新闻的成色不足、新闻来源途径单一、深度调查力度不够、环境伦理解读不深等问题。We compared the media reporting on the PM2.5 by the major newspapers in China and the USA. In particular,we examined the differences in the total numbers,contents,genres,and sources of the reports on the PM2.5 in the People's Daily of China and the New York Times of the USA. Our goals here are to better understand the current status of the reporting on the environmental issues in China and to draw lessons from the USA. We found that the reporting in the two countries differs in the coverage patterns, focuses,formats,styles,and sources of news and concluded that there are fewer scientific facts and knowledge,limited sources of news,less investigational reporting,and a lack of informed environmental ethics in the reporting in China.
分 类 号:X51[环境科学与工程—环境工程] G212[文化科学—新闻学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.229