浅析《楚辞》与《汉书·艺文志》“屈原赋之属”  

Analysis of "Qu Yuan Fu" of "Chu Ci" and "Hanshu · Yiwenzhi"

作　　者：温晓玲[1] 

机构地区：[1]河北师范大学,河北石家庄050024

出　　处：《佳木斯职业学院学报》2014年第1期80-,82,共2页Journal of Jiamusi Vocational Institute

摘　　要：作为中国第一部个人诗歌总集的《楚辞》,一方面向我们展示了伟大诗人屈原的慊谦爱国之心;另一方面充斥着大量神话影子和神游景象也揭开了早期先民图腾崇拜的影子。作为我国现存最早的目录学文献,汉志提供了先秦两汉时期中国图书的成熟情况,但在收书如此浩瀚的巨著中,独诗赋略较其余几略显得暗淡无光,其中的"诗赋略"在没有小序又夹杂种种疑问,而后世所说《楚辞》的踪影也无迹可寻,这给研究《楚辞》者带来诸多困惑。本文即以此为出发点,通过探讨汉志"诗赋略"中的"屈原赋之属",得出今本《楚辞》并非选自"屈原赋之属"但其编纂者确为刘向无疑。As China's first personal poetry anthology,on the one hand 'Chu Ci' shows the great patriotism of poet Qu Yuan to us; on the other hand full of myth shadow and fugue scene also unveiled the shadow of early ancestors totem worship. As China's earliest extant literature bibliography,Han Zhi provides mature Chinese books in Qin and Han Dynasties,but in the book,and Shifulve is slightly dim and dark,has no small order and clip hybrid interrogative,but later 'Chu Ci' is untraceable,which brings a lot of confusion. In this paper,by discussing the 'Qu Yuan Fu',to obtain that 'Chu Ci' is not from 'Qu Yuan Fu' but undoubtedly the lexicographer is Liu Xiang.

关 键 词：汉志 屈原赋之属 《楚辞》 刘向 

分 类 号：I207.22[文学—中国文学]