论作为公司强制解散替代路径的股权强制收购——从林某诉凯莱公司、戴某等公司解散纠纷案谈起  

Compulsory transfer of shares and judicial dissolution:a case study

作　　者：戴庆康[1] 

机构地区：[1]东南大学法学院,江苏南京210096

出　　处：《东南大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》2015年第5期95-100,155-156,共8页Journal of Southeast University(Philosophy and Social Science)

摘　　要：当公司股东因公司僵局而诉请解散公司后,如果公司或其他股东同意以公平合理的价格回购或收购原告股权,则公司僵局并非只有解散公司才能解决,公司存续并不会损害股东利益。从《公司法》的立法本意、公司的社会责任及利益相关者的利益均衡原则考虑,此时,应以强制收购离散股东代替强制解散,从而实现原告股东利益、其他股东利益和公司债权人等第三人利益的均衡保护。In a judicial dissolution of a corporation case filed by a shareholder,dissolution is not the only way out if thecorporation or its other shareholders offer to buy back the plaintiff's shares at a fair and reasonable price. Be-sides,the survival of the corporation does not damage the interests of the shareholders. Taking all factors into con-sideration,compulsory transfer of shares rather than dissolution can be adopted so as to achieve an equitable pro-tection of the interests of the plaintiff,other shareholders and interested third parties such as creditors.

关 键 词：公司僵局 强制收购 司法解散公司 公司社会责任 

分 类 号：D922.291.91[政治法律—经济法学] D920.5[政治法律—法学]