检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:王德新[1]
机构地区:[1]山东师范大学,山东济南250014
出 处:《河南社会科学》2015年第5期46-53 123,共8页Henan Social Sciences
基 金:教育部人文社会科学研究青年基金项目(11YJC820113);山东省高等学校优秀中青年骨干教师国际合作培养计划;山东师范大学优秀青年骨干教师国际合作培养计划
摘 要:我国针对生效裁判设计了一套发达的涉诉信访和再审申诉机制。传统儒家文化与现代法治文化之间的冲突,使得申诉信访机制改革遭遇了一系列的困境。突围之道,不能仅从诉讼法学科狭隘的范围内探寻,而需要从以现代法治文化统摄传统文化的高度,从正当法律程序的重塑、检察机关与法院之间的关系、程序制裁理论与立法的完善等宏大的视野,对我国申诉信访的理念和运作机制进行全面的审视和革新。According to our country's effective judgment to design a set of advanced litigation petition and retrial mechanism. The conflict between traditional culture and modern culture of rule of law,the petition mechanism reform has encountered a series of difficulties. The method to solve the problem, not only from the scope of litigation law within the narrow search, from the traditional culture with modern legal culture commanding height, from the due process of law, to reshape the relationship between procuratorial organs and courts, judge theory and legislation perfection of grand view, to overhaul the complaint petition in China the concept and operation mechanism.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.28