专家法律意见书探究——基于法治立场的反思  

Jurist’s Legal Submissions:Reflections from the Perspective of Rule of Law

作　　者：李小红[1] 

机构地区：[1]三江学院法律系

出　　处：《三江高教》2014年第1期49-60,共12页Higher Education of Sanjiang University

基　　金：江苏省教育厅指导项目(项目编号:2013SJD820021)

摘　　要：法学家的任何法律参与行为在为法治贡献正推力的同时,也不可避免会产生反推。专家法律意见书进入法庭,法不禁止,但并不合理。分析专家法律意见书的催生原因可归纳为以下几点:当事人寻求专业支撑但也在制造关系;法学家秉持公义精神但也受私利驱动;法官则或有惰怠与推卸责任之意。专家法律意见书可能会扭曲学术品格,异化诉讼程序,扩大裁判法源。The jurist’s participation can absolutely promote the progress of rule of law,but it inevitablely brings about an? adverse effect at the same time. The jurist’s legal submissions to the court are not prohibited,but they are unreasonable. The reasons for the existence of the jurist’s legal submissions lie in the fact that the involved parties want to seek professional assistance from the jurist who upholds the spirit of justice,but is driven by self- interest as well,while the judges want to slack off at work and shirk responsibility. This leads to entangled interest relations. More seriously,it leads to legal? origin? chaos,differentiated litigation procedure,? and distorted legal culture.

关 键 词：法学家 法律参与 司法实践 专家法律意见书 

分 类 号：D926.2[政治法律—法学]