法学研究中的价值处理  

Perspectives on the Value Dimension of Law in Legal Study

作　　者：周永坤[1] 

机构地区：[1]苏州大学法学院,教授博士生导师21500

出　　处：《法制与社会发展》2004年第4期110-122,共13页Law and Social Development

摘　　要：价值法学本身经历了重内容、重形式、重程序、程序与内容并重的进化路径。重内容的法学是价值法学的中坚 ,但是以启蒙理性为特色的片面的重内容的法学却极易走向自己的反面———价值独断与极权。法学研究中的形式转向是法的一般理论从法哲学中分化出来的前提 ,但极端形式主义最终导致价值相对主义甚至道德相对主义 ,是法律灾变的理论诱因。重程序的法理学是结合形式与内容的枢纽 ,但片面的重程序也会导致价值无涉。考夫曼的程序与内容并重的法理学代表了 2Value jurisprudence has experienced an innovative approach of emphasizing on content, on form, on procedure, and on both procedure and content. The jurisprudence of emphasizing on content is the nucleus of value jurisprudence, but the one-sided jurisprudence of emphasizing on content which is featured with enlightening rationality tends to go to its opposite, that is, value arbitrariness and autarchy. The diversion towards emphasizing on form in legal sturdy laid the foundation for the general legal theory to differentiate from the philosophy of law, but the extreme formalism would finally result in value relativism, and even moral relativism, which proves to be the theoretical inducer of disastrous change in law. The jurisprudence of emphasizing on procedure is the key of combining form with the content, but unilateral emphasizing on procedure would result in non-value. Kaufmann’s jurisprudence of emphasizing on both procedure and content represents the developing trend of jurisprudent in the 21st century.

关 键 词：法学研究 法哲学 道德相对主义 价值相对主义 反价值法学 价值法学 

分 类 号：D90[政治法律—法学理论]