孔子作《左传》“蓝本”的史实否定不了——再驳牛鸿恩之“驳议”  

The Fact of Confucius' Original Version of Zuo Zhuan Is Undeniable: Re-disprove of Mr. NIU Hong-en's Disprove

作　　者：姚曼波[1] 

机构地区：[1]江苏教育学院中文系,江苏南京210013

出　　处：《聊城大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》2004年第3期1-6,10,共7页

摘　　要：汉人一致称道 :孔子《春秋》之中“弑君三十六 ,亡国五十二”。这是考证孔子《春秋》的重要证据之一。所谓“弑君三十六亡国五十二” ,是指孔子《春秋》之中有“弑君”之事三十六起 ,“亡国”之事五十二起。牛鸿恩《“弑君三十六 ,亡国五十二”考实》(载《聊城大学学报》2 0 0 3年第 5、6期 )一文 ,根据他自己给出的主观“界定” ,否定这一史实 ,并称笔者的“选题不具有学术价值”。牛先生不仅对笔者的研究成果表示不屑 ,而且从根本上否定孔子作《春秋》的历史功绩 ,实在“背于情理”。The Scholars in the Han Dynasty unanimously claimed that “36 monarchs' murdering and 52 states' disenthronement' was recorded in Confucius' Autumn and Spring Annals. This is one of the important evidence to testify the authenticity of Confucius' Autumn and Spring Annals. The statement of “36 monarchs' murdering and 53 states' disenthronement' indicates that there were 36 cases of killing monarchs and 52 cases of demolishing states. Mr. NIU Hong-en in his article Textual Research of 36 Monarchs' Murdering and 52 States' Disenthronement, arbitrarily gave his own subjective definition of this statement and neglected the historical fact. He denied scornfully not only the academic value of my research, but also the historical contribution of Confucius' compiling of the Autumn and Spring Annals. Unfortunately Mr.NIU's argument is really “unreasonable'.

关 键 词：孔子《春秋》 《左传》蓝本 

分 类 号：K204[历史地理—历史学]