检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]天津市胸科医院 [2]天津市心血管病研究所
出 处:《临床心血管病杂志》1989年第3期145-147,共3页Journal of Clinical Cardiology
摘 要:术文通过踏车运动试验对28例风心病房颤患者应用地戈辛(D)和异搏定(V)治疗进行观察,结果显示:单用 V 和 D+V 两种治疗在控制房颤静息和运动状态下心室率、提高运动耐受力均优于单用 D 治疗。临床观察认为,对于心功能Ⅰ~Ⅱ级者就减低房颤心室率而言,异搏定可取代地戈辛作为首选治疗,但对既往有心衰史、心功能差者,两药合用更为安全有效。28 patients suffering from rheumatic heart disease with atrial fibrillation on digoxin or/and verapamil therapy were studied by exgomey bicycle exercise test.Results were as follow:verapamil alone and verapamil plus digoxin were superior to digoxin in controlling resting and exercising ventricular rate and improving exercise capacity in patients with atrial fibrillation.The results suggested that verapami is the treatment of first choice in educing ventricular rate of patients with atrial fibrillation,whose cardiac function is Ⅰ-Ⅱ degree.If the patients cardiac function was worse,combining use of digoxin and verapamil is more safe and effect.
分 类 号:R541.205[医药卫生—心血管疾病]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.249