检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]中国人民大学法学院 [2]北京市政法管理干部学院国际经贸法律系
出 处:《北京市政法管理干部学院学报》2004年第2期6-9,共4页
摘 要:对世界贸易组织规则 (以下简称 WTO规则 )的研究很多 ,但对国际私法与 WTO规则关系比较的研究 ,则尚属缺门 ,而且 ,还出现了世贸组织成立之后 ,国际私法的作用削弱了的意见 ;但实际上国际私法的作用反而更大了。本文论述国际私法与 WTO规则的联系与区别、效力比较、WTO规则能否在法院直接适用、国际私法在 WTO规则促进下的新发展 ,并提出尽快完善我国国际私法立法 ,更好地实施 WTO规则。A lot of studies have been made on WTO rules, but there has been few comparative study on the relationship between private international law and WTO rules. Besides, some people think that the function of private international law is weakening after the foundation of WTO. In the authors' opinion, however, the function is strengthening. The article discusses the connection and the difference between private international law and WTO rules and makes a comparison between their respective effects. The article also discusses whether WTO rules can be applied directly in domestic courts and the new development of private international law under the promotion of WTO rules. The article suggests perfecting private international law of the People's Republic of China in order to enforce WTO rules better.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.15