检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:王剑鹰[1]
机构地区:[1]西南政法大学,重庆400031
出 处:《现代法学》2002年第1期125-133,共9页Modern Law Science
摘 要:本文始以探究立宪主义的内在规定性 ,包括其规范要求及价值内核 ,并以现代性为背景 ,追问立宪主义的普适性。以此为前提 ,主要从分权与制衡及人权保障两个方面描述立宪主义在亚洲的际遇 ,并侧重从政治学、社会学的视角给以解析。结语进一步廓清立宪主义得以在亚洲确立的条件 ,并对在亚洲确立立宪主义的前景有所冀望。但未提出“亚洲立宪主义”的明确概念。This thesis begins with the exploration of the inwardness of the Constitutionalism, including its requirement on system and its worthiness, and then pumps its popularity on the background of the Modernity. Depending on all the premises, the writer depicts the favorable situation of the Constitutionalism in Asia on the sides of the decentralization of three powers in country and checks and balance of these three powers and guarantee of human rights, and then analyzes these circles particularly in the politics and sociology. In the conclusive part of this thesis, the writer deals with the conditions to establish the Constitutionalism in Asia more and while giving good hopes to the foreground of the Constitutionalism in Asia. Nevertheless, the writer doesn't offer a specific concept of the Hamito-semitic Constitution.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.3