检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
出 处:《上海针灸杂志》2004年第7期19-20,共2页Shanghai Journal of Acupuncture and Moxibustion
摘 要:目的 通过 3种不同的取穴方法观察对针刺治疗术后肠麻痹的影响。方法 采用单纯远端的下合穴、以腹部近端与远端下合穴的循经取穴、背俞与远端下合穴的循经取穴 3种方法 ,观察针刺治疗肠麻痹的可行性及其治疗效果。结果 3种方法中 ,背俞与远端下合穴配合效果最好 ,腹部近端配合远端下合穴循经取穴效果次之 ,单纯远端下合穴再次之。但三者经统计学处理 P>0 .0 5 ,没有显著性差异。结论 术后肠麻痹患者 ,从其可行性上看 ,腰背部最不便于取穴 ,腹部可取穴性也不高 ,单纯下合穴最为可行。不要强行针刺局部腰腹部穴位 ,以免引起不必要的伤害。Purpose To investigate the influences of three different methods of selecting points on acupuncture treatment of postoperative enteroparalysis. Methods Three methods, only selecting distant lower He-Sea points, selecting adjacent abdominal points and distant lower He-Sea points along meridians and selecting Back-shu points and distant lower He-Sea points along meridians, were used to investigate the feasibility of acupuncture treatment of postoperative enteroparalysis and its curative effect. Results Of the three methods, the cooperation of Back-shu points and distant lower He-Sea points produced a best effect, the effect of adjacent abdominal points in cooperation with selection of distant lower He-Sea points along meridians took second place and the effect of simple distant lower He-Sea points took third place. But statistical analysis showed no significant difference among the three (P>0.05).Conclusion In patients with postoperative enteroparalysis, selection of points in the lumbodorsal area is most infeasible; selection of points in the abdominal area is also not very feasible; selection of simple lower He-Sea points is most feasible. Lumbo-abdominal points should not be needled unreasonably to avoid unnecessary injuries.
分 类 号:R246.2[医药卫生—针灸推拿学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.229