检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:杨桂华[1]
机构地区:[1]云南大学工商管理与旅游管理学院旅游管理系,云南昆明650091
出 处:《旅游学刊》2004年第4期53-56,共4页Tourism Tribune
基 金:国家自然科学基金项目 ( 4 0 0 610 0 8);云南省自然科学基金项目 ( 2 0 0 0C0 0 12M)
摘 要:基于传统大众旅游弊端提出的生态旅游 ,最大的特点就是具有责任性。围绕生态旅游的责任性的旅游开发和管理实践在世界各地均有积累 ,但缺乏系统的理论提炼。本文从责任的双向性为切入点 ,在分析传统大众旅游的单向责任模式和早期生态旅游的单向责任模式的基础上 ,提出了生态旅游双向责任模式 ,进而比较三种旅游责任模式的差别 ,最后从自然生态旅游目的地、社区生态旅游目的地和生态旅游者三个方面来探索生态旅游双向责任模式实现的途径。Ecotourism, as a new different tourism to avoid the abuse of traditional popular tourism, has the basic characteristic of emphasizing bidirectional responsibility for both tourist and destination. Much more discussions about the issue of responsibility in tourism development and management have been reported and accumulated from various parts of the world, while no systematic theoretical analysis is found. In this paper the author focuses on the tropism of responsibility. Based on the analysis of the mono-responsibility model of traditional popular tourism and the mono-responsibility of early ecotourism, the bidirectional responsibility model of ecotourism is offered. The differences between the three responsibility models are further discussed. Finally the ways and measures of how to implement bidirectional responsibility model from three aspects, including the management, local residents of natural ecotourism destination and also the tourist, are discussed.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.229