论董事法律地位的法定性与意定性  

On Lawfulness and Autonomy of Director's Judicial Position

作　　者：肖泳冰[1] 

机构地区：[1]扬州大学政法学院,江苏扬州225009

出　　处：《中国矿业大学学报（社会科学版）》2002年第2期67-73,共7页Journal of China University of Mining & Technology(Social Sciences)

摘　　要：本文分析了对公司董事法律地位的传统阐释的缺陷 ,认为 :无论是委任说、信托说还是代理说、法定说 ,在解释公司与其董事之间的法律关系时均存在着不足之处 ,公司与董事之间应为法定性和意定性的统一 ,传统的解释实际上只在意定的范围内才是正确的 ,但不足以解释董事的全部法律地位。After analyzing the drawbacks of the traditionally defined judicial position between the company and the director, the essay points out the following:first,whether from theory of commitment,trust,agent or lawfulness, there are drawbacks in expounding the judicial relationship between the company and the director;second,there should be a unity of lawfulness and autonomy between the company and the director;third,the traditional explanation is virtually correct only in the sense of autonomy, which can't interpret all the judicial positions of the director. The essay also gives a general account of the company's board system.

关 键 词：公司董事制度 法律地位 业务执行权 委任制度 《公司法》 

分 类 号：D912.29[政治法律—民商法学]