检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]南开大学法学系,天津300071 [2]南开大学国际经济法研究所,天津300071
出 处:《天津市政法管理干部学院学报》2004年第3期27-31,共5页Journal of Tianjin Administrative Institute of Political Science & Law
摘 要:基于资产证券化的风险隔离机制,在资产转让的信托型、担保融资型和资产出售型等多种选择方式中,资产出售是最好的选择。但根据美国的司法实践,一项资产转让什么时候构成“真实出售”,虽然有一些判定标准,却并不十分明朗,可能会受到法院重新定性的影响。同样,在我国,实现资产转让更是存在着合同法和担保法等方面的困难和障碍,也没有重新定性的相应规则和实践。因此,在开展资产证券化业务已成共识的情况下,我国必须尽早做出立法应对,建立有关资产证券化的单行法律,为资产证券化创造良好的法律环境。For the purpose of risk-remote institution in asset securitization, asset sale is the best choice of many ways in asset transfer. According to the experience in America, the standard of “True Sale”has not been very clear, and it would be canceled or recharacterized as a secured loan in a bankruptcy of the originator sometimes. Obviously, there are many obstacles in the legal system of China, such as contract law and guarantee law, and we have little experience in characterization. So we must make rules through legislative procedure, and provide perfect environment for asset securitization.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.147