默示预期违约与不安抗辩权制度法系适应性之探讨  

Discussion on Legal System Adaptability of Implied Anticipatory Breach of Contract and Precarious Right to Defense

作　　者：李军[1] 

机构地区：[1]新疆大学,新疆乌鲁木齐830046

出　　处：《政法论坛》2004年第4期161-167,共7页Tribune of Political Science and Law

摘　　要：默示预期违约是英美法系的特有制度 ,大陆法系各国民法典一般只规定不安抗辩权 ,它是作为双务合同的特殊效力规定于合同的效力部分。之所以有此区别 ,其原因在于大陆民法体系追求体系完美、逻辑严密而在保护合同一方当事人中煞费苦心 ,而英美法国家的法官可以判例形式创设一项新的法律制度 ,即特殊的违约救济制度———默示预期违约制度。Implied anticipatory breach of contract is a special form of breach of contract which only exists in common law system, meanwhile the countries with traditions of continental law have adopted precarious right to defense instead of implied anticipatory breach of contract。 Precarious right to defense is provided in the part of contract validity as special effectiveness in bilateral contracts. The difference is made because the civil law system pursues the perfection of system, logic, and makes great efforts in protecting a party of a contract. The judges in common law countries can create a new legal system through cases, i.e. a special remedy system of breach of contract—implied anticipatory breach of contract.

关 键 词：默示预期违约 不安抗辩权 英美法系 大陆法系 民法 违约救济制度 

分 类 号：D913[政治法律—民商法学]