检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]焦作市第二人民医院检验科,河南焦作454152 [2]焦作市第二人民医院中药房,河南焦作454152
出 处:《临床军医杂志》2004年第3期93-94,共2页Clinical Journal of Medical Officers
摘 要:目的 对电化学发光免疫法测定甲胎蛋白进行临床评价。方法 将电化学发光免疫法与酶联免疫法进行比较 ,分析这两种方法的精密度、准确性。结果 两种方法有良好相关性。电化学发光免疫法线性范围较宽。最低检测浓度在 0 80 μg/L。结论 电化学发光免疫法测定结果准确度、精密度均优于酶联免疫法 。Objective To determine the clinical value of ECLI and ELISA for detection of AFP.Methods The two methds were compared.Meanwhile,their precision accuracy,were analzed.Results AFP values by ECLI was correlated well to by the ELISA method.The assay was more wider linear than ELISA.The lowest detectable concentration was 0.80 μg/L.Conclusion The precision and accurancy of electrochemiluminescence immunoassay are more advantager than enzyme linked immunosorbent assay.It can be widely used in clinical laboratory tests.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.145