关于司法审查制度的思考——以法官李慧娟、赵广云受处分事件为视角  

Reflection on the Routine of Interrogation in Violation to the Constitution——From the Event of Disciplinary Action against Judge LI Hui-juan and ZHAO Guang-yun

作　　者：韩哲[1] 

机构地区：[1]中国青年政治学院法律系,北京100089

出　　处：《中国青年政治学院学报》2004年第4期111-115,共5页Journal of China Youth College for Political Sciences

摘　　要：人大对法院具有监督权,但是这种监督权不包括个案监督权。法官具有法律适用权,没有司法审查权,这就要求法官在行使法律适用权时保持适度克制,不能越权行使司法审查权。中国目前迫切需要建立有限司法审查权制度。People's Congress has a right to supervise the justice court, but such a right does not include the right of case supervision. A judge has a right of legal application, but not the right of interrogation. In this sense, a judge needs to keep reasonable self-restraint in using his legal application rights, and should not enforce the right of legal interrogation beyond his power sphere. It seems emergent now for China to set up a system of limited legal right of interrogation.

关 键 词：人大监督 司法审查 法律冲突 解决机制 

分 类 号：D926[政治法律—法学]