真实发展指标的方法学研究及其应用  

Genuine Progress Indicator Methodology and the Case Study

作　　者：温宗国[1] 张坤民[1] 陈伟强[1] 杜斌[1] 宋国君[2] 

机构地区：[1]清华大学环境科学与工程系,北京100084 [2]中国人民大学环境学院,北京100872

出　　处：《中国软科学》2004年第8期145-151,共7页China Soft Science

基　　金：国家自然科学基金项目(项目编号:70172028)

摘　　要：衡量区域发展的GDP核算体系存在明显缺陷,本研究开发了真实发展指标(GenuineProgressIndicator,GPI)作为新的可替代方法。GPI包括经济、环境和社会三个账户,根据所创建的方法学本文以苏州、宁波、广州、扬州为案例进行研究。测试结果验证了单纯以GDP衡量发展的缺陷,而GPI则能有效地衡量城市可持续性,评价经济增长的效益和成本。As an indicator of development progress, GDP has some obvious disadvantages. This research develops Genuine Progress Indicator (GPI) as an alternative indicator. GPI was divided into three components including economy, society and environment. With the methodology developed, a case study was made in Suzhou, Ningbo, Guangzhou, and Yangzhou city. The result shows that it has faults in measuring progress only with GDP, while GPI can measure the urban sustainability effectively and evaluate the performance and the cost of the economic growth.

关 键 词：真实发展指标 GDP 经济核算体系 可持续发展 自然资源损耗 环境污染 

分 类 号：F222.33[经济管理—国民经济]