西方古典哲学家论模糊性的本质  

On the essence of fuzziness in the light of western classical philosophers

作　　者：何建南[1] 

机构地区：[1]五邑大学社会科学与艺术部,广东江门529020

出　　处：《五邑大学学报（社会科学版）》2004年第3期1-5,23,共6页Journal of Wuyi University(Social Sciences Edition)

基　　金：国家自然科学基金(No.60075014)

摘　　要：西方哲学史主要从本体论和认识论方面探讨了模糊性问题。古希腊朴素辩证法思想提出了模糊思维与辩证思维的关系问题,并孕育着现代多值逻辑的萌芽。近代哲学不仅确认了不确定性、模糊性现象的客观存在,而且进一步分析了“认识本身的模糊性”,并试图揭示其产生的内在机制。The issue of fuzziness was discussed mainly from perspective of ontology and epistemology in classical history of western philosophy. Ancient Greek philosophers touched on the relationship between fuzzy thinking and dialectical thinking, and foresaw the idea of contemporary multi - valued logic. Modem philosophers not only confirmed the fact that phenomena of ncertainty and fuzziness exist, but further analyzed 'the fuzziness of cognition itself ', and tried to uncover the inherent mechanism in which it appears.

关 键 词：模糊性 本体论 认识论 逻辑 古希腊哲学 西方近代哲学 

分 类 号：B12[哲学宗教—世界哲学]