论物上请求权  

On Right of Real Claim

作　　者：苑书涛[1] 

机构地区：[1]西南政法大学民商法学院,重庆400031

出　　处：《河南社会科学》2004年第4期47-50,共4页Henan Social Sciences

摘　　要：物上请求权是指物权的圆满状态受到妨害或者有被妨害之虞时,物权人为排除妨害或者防止妨害的发生,恢复物权的圆满状态,得对现为妨害或者将为妨害的人请求为一定行为或者不为一定行为的权利。其性质是以物权为基础权利的独立请求权,可适用于债的履行或给付的规定。物上请求权既适用于所有权、他物权,也适用于占有,其类别有返还请求权、妨害除去请求权和妨害防止请求权三种。根据物上请求权的性质和内容,不能一概肯定或者否定物上请求权适用消灭时效。我国现行民事立法强调了物上请求权的民事责任性质,但是物上请求权的完善,应该不是我国现行民事立法上的承担民事责任的方式所能够容纳的。由物上请求权的性质所决定,我国应当在物权之下建立独立的物上请求权制度。The Right of Real Claim is a right entitling the Real Right holders to demand the invader to do or not to do certain things, when the completion of Real right is or to be interrupted, to exclude the hindrance or prevent the disturbance from happening. The Right, an independent right of claim based on Real Rights, is in the scope of the provisions on the performance of obligations or prestation, when it goes into reality. Furthermore, the Right of Real Claim, including the claim for restitution of property, the claim for exclusion of hindrance and the claim for prevention from disturbance, applies to not only the title to property and the right in a thing under the control of another, but also possession. In term of the nature and content of the Right of Real Claim, we cannot wholly affirm or deny the Right of Real Claim should be governed by the extinctive prescription. In our current civil legislation, the content of the Right of Real Claim is provided in the civil liability for tort, emphasizing the nature of civil liability of the Right of Real Claim. But the liability in our current civil legislation cannot satisfy the completion of the Right of Real claim. Decided by the nature of the Right of Real Claim, our legislation should establish an independent system of the Right of Real Claim in the Real Right part.

关 键 词：物上请求权 性质 适用范围 种类 诉讼时效 

分 类 号：D9[政治法律—法学]