检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:郭书山[1]
出 处:《河南社会科学》2004年第4期55-57,共3页Henan Social Sciences
摘 要:我国刑法关于缓刑的立法设置仍然存在着有待进一步完善的地方:立法应当设定一个统一的适用标准来判断何谓缓刑的实质条件———不致再危害社会;公安机关仍然应当是最适宜的缓刑考察机关,不过公安机关和群众监督要相互依存、相互制约;建议增加行业人士介入到缓刑考察的过程中;对因为犯新罪而被撤销缓刑的,新罪在犯罪性质或刑罚种类上可作一些必要的限制;刑法应当肯定缓刑也能减刑。In the criminal law of our country, there still exist many insufficiencies concerning the stipulation of probation. therefore it is an urge to make further improvement. firstly, it is very necessary to set up an universal standard to judge what is the substantive term of probation--unlikely to endanger society once more. secondly, public security organs remain the most proper ones to shoulder the responsibility to investigate probation on condition that they do so under the surveillance of the masses. Thirdly, an appeal that professionals be allowed to take an active part in the cource of probation investigation is also put forward, in the article. What's more, it is essential to set limits to the new crime for which the probation is annulled. Finally, It should be clearly stated in the criminal law that probationers also have the right to acquire abatement of penalty.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.145