检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:查振中[1]
机构地区:[1]安庆石化医院,安徽安庆246001
出 处:《中国现代应用药学》2003年第6期523-524,共2页Chinese Journal of Modern Applied Pharmacy
摘 要:目的 从药物经济学角度分析评价血塞通注射液和尼莫地平注射液治疗脑梗塞的特点。方法 运用成本 效果分析法 ,计算两种治疗方案 1个疗程的治疗费用和临床疗效 ,并计算成本 效果比 (C/E)。结果 血塞通组治疗费用为 1972 .4 0元 /疗程 ,有效率 91.84 % ;尼莫地平组治疗费用为 2 890 .4 0元 /疗程 ,有效率 90 .6 2 % ,两组的C/E分别为 2 1.4 6和 31.90。OBJECTIVE To analyze and evaluate the pharmacoeconomic characteristics of Xuesaitong injection and nimodipine injection in treatment of cerebral infarction. METHOD Cost effectiveness analysis method was used to calculate the cost of treatment and the clinic effectiveness of two therapeutic schemes in one period of treatment. The cost effectiveness ratio (C/E) was calculated at the same time. RESULTS The cost was 1972.40 RMB in Xuesaitong group , 2890.40 RMB in nimodipine group .The effective rates were 91.84% and 90.62% ,and the C/E were 21.64 and 31.90 respectively.CONCLUSION The xuesaitong group had advantage in C/E, and was one of better treatment schemes of cerebral infarction.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.195