检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]广东医学院附属医院儿科,广东湛江524001
出 处:《现代临床护理》2004年第4期22-23,共2页Modern Clinical Nursing
摘 要:目的比较两种不同新生儿留置胃管方法的效果。方法把需留置胃管的新生儿随机分为两组,经口留置胃管组30例,经鼻留置胃管组25例,比较两组患儿的一次插管成功率、相关并发症。结果两组在一次插管成功率,插管过程相关并发症的发生率比较,差异均有统计学意义,P<0.01。结论新生儿经口留置胃管比经鼻留置胃管插管成功率高,并发症少。Objective To compare the effects of two different indwelling gastric tube methods in newborns. Methods All newborns were divided into two groups with 30 cases in mouse-stomach and 25 cases in nose-stomach. The rates of success of indwelling gastric tube and the occurrence of complications were compared in the two groups. Results There are significant differences between the two groups in terms of the rate of success of indwelling gastric tube and the occurrence of complications (P < 0.01). Conclusions The method of indwelling gastric tube in mouse-stomach is better than that in nose-stomach in newborns.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.15