检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:李红梅[1]
机构地区:[1]西安建筑科技大学人文学院,陕西西安710055
出 处:《西安建筑科技大学学报(社会科学版)》2004年第3期50-52,共3页Journal of Xi'an University of Architecture & Technology(Social Science Edition)
摘 要:先例判决制度的施行引发了社会各界对判例定位问题的重新思考。尽管理论界对把判例制度引入我国 ,并将判例作为我国法律渊源之一的讨论已有十余年 ,但真正以制度的形式赋予判例拘束力这还是第一次。本文通过考察先例判决制度在我国的施行状况 ,比较两大法系国家判例拘束力的法律定位 ,结合我国的司法现状 。The enforcement of verdict system according to the precedents arouses the new thinking about the issue of how to position the precedents. Although the system of precedent has bee theoretialy introduced into our country and has been discussed as one of the origins of our country's law for over ten years, it is the first time to impose the binding force on the verdict in the from of system. By examining the present situation of the enforcement of verdict system according to the precedents in our country, comparing the legal positioning of the state's binding force on the verdict in these two countries, and analyzing the present judicial state in our country, this paper puts forward the ways to realize the binding force on the verdict in of our country.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.15