检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]北京协和医院,北京100730
出 处:《核技术》1993年第11期674-678,共5页Nuclear Techniques
摘 要:对SPECT图像的单能窗、双能窗及多能窗加权采集三种散射校正方法进行比较研究。模型实验及临床试验结果均为单能窗(对称窗)采集时对比度及FSD%(标准差分数百分值)最小,多能窗加权采集时对比度及FSD%均最大,双能窗采集时对比度和FSD%介于二者之间。虽然多能窗加权采集法从对比度和FSD%综合考虑明显优于单能窗及双能窗采集法,但是该方法计算过程复杂、占用内存大。双能窗采集法相对简单、结果可靠,更适合于临床常规应用。Three scatter correction techniques including (Ⅰ) single energy window,(Ⅱ) dual energy window, and (Ⅲ) multi- energy window weighted acquisition were compared in this study. Results indicated that the contrast and percentage fraction standard deviation(FSD%) were smallest in Ⅰ and largest in Ⅲ, as calculated from phantom test and clinical application. Although the result of Ⅲ is the best, its calculation is very complicated and occupies more disk space. It concludes that Ⅱ is more suitable for routine clinical use, due to its simplicity and accuracy.
分 类 号:R817-33[医药卫生—影像医学与核医学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.15