论取得时效制度及其立法体例  

Research on the Institution of Usucaption and the Legislative Style of the Institution of Usucaption

作　　者：王鹏[1] 

机构地区：[1]上海交通大学法学院,上海200030

出　　处：《华东船舶工业学院学报（社会科学版）》2004年第3期13-15,50,共4页Journal of East China Shipbuilding Institute(Social Science Edition)

摘　　要：取得时效制度已经被大多数的国家所承认 ,而我国的民法通则并没有规定取得时效制度。学术界有两种观点 ,一为肯定说 ,一为否定说。笔者认为我国在制定民法典时应建立取得时效制度 。The institution of usucaption has been accepted by many countries. It is not provided in civil law of China. There are two doctrines in the academic world. One is affirmative doctrine, another is negative doctrine. The author thinks that it should been established in the code of civil law. It should adopt legislative style on behalf of the code of French civil law.

关 键 词：取得时效 立法体例 肯定 否定 

分 类 号：D923[政治法律—民商法学]