检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]解放军第105医院中西医结合科,合肥230031
出 处:《东南国防医药》2004年第5期335-336,共2页Military Medical Journal of Southeast China
摘 要:目的 探讨“健脾补肾冲剂”对脾肾阳虚型功能性消化不良的作用。方法 选择脾肾阳虚型功能性消化不良患者 80例 ,用“健脾补肾冲剂”对其治疗 ,并设西沙比利治疗 6 0例作对照 ,从临床主要症状按照统一拟定的疗效标准采用症状积分法来观察治疗效果。结果 治疗组与对照组比较 ,治疗后平均积分治疗组优于对照组 (P<0 .0 0 1)。两组治疗前后疗效比较 ,总有效率优于对照组 (P<0 .0 0 5 )。两组脾肾阳虚症状改善率 ,治疗组优于对照组 (P<0 .0 0 5 )。结论 “健脾补肾冲剂”治疗脾肾阳虚型功能性消化不良优于对照组。Objective To explore the self-prescribed herbal medicine (spleen-invigorating and renal tonic) for dyspepsia patients with positive spleen- and kidney-weakness type.Methods Eighty patients with dyspepsia were treated with our self-prescribed herbal medicine and other sixty patients with the same diagnosis were treated with cisapride. The efficacy was assessed by standardized symptomatic score. Results To compare treatment group with control group, the average score in treatment group was superior to that in control group, the difference was significant statistically (P<0.001). The comparison of curative effect before and after treatment in two groups, overall response rate in treatment group was superior to control group (P<0.005). The improving rate of positive spleen- and kidney-weakness symptoms in treatment group was superior to that in control group (P< 0.005 ).Conclusions Our observation shows the self-prescribed herbal medicine to be effective for patients with functional dyspepsia of positive spleen- and kidney-weakness type.
关 键 词:健脾补肾 对照组 冲剂 治疗组 脾肾阳虚型 功能性消化不良 治疗功能 统一
分 类 号:R259[医药卫生—中西医结合] R554.6[医药卫生—中医内科学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.216.51.7