鼻腔深部出血止血方法的比较观察  

A comparative observation on four methods to control bleeding of deep nasal cavity

作　　者：陈煜[1] 张慧敏[1] 王东[1] 

机构地区：[1]山西省人民医院,030012

出　　处：《山西医药杂志》2004年第9期751-752,共2页Shanxi Medical Journal

摘　　要：目的　通过对鼻腔深部出血 4种止血方法的比较观察 ,探求最优的止血方法。方法　选择自1997年 1月至 2 0 0 3年 12月的 2 83例患者 ,经鼻内窥镜采用填塞、渗钕钇铝石榴石 (YAG)激光、高频电凝及射频治疗鼻腔深部出血 ,观察各种方法的疗效。结果　 4种治疗效果无明显统计学意义 (P>0 .0 5 ) ,但填塞患者的痛苦较大。结论　 4种止血方法比较 ,各有所长 ,射频治疗有一定的优势 。Objective In order to clarify the optimum method to control epistaxis,we compared and observed four methods to control bleeding of deep nasal cavity.Methods Two hundred and eighty-three patients were treated with nasal tamponing,YAG laser,electrocoagulation and radiofrequency to control their epistaxis through endoscopy during 1997-2003,then the results of these treatments were observed comparatively.Results There were no significant differences among the four methods (P>0.05),but the patients with nasal tamponing got more suffering.Conclusion Each has its strong point among the four methods,but radiofrequency is the best treatment to control epistaxis.

关 键 词：止血方法 鼻腔深部出血 比较观察 填塞 射频治疗 患者 高频电凝 所长 目的 最优 

分 类 号：R765.23[医药卫生—耳鼻咽喉科]