检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]第一军医大学附属南方医院神经外科,广东省广州市510515 [2]第一军医大学附属南方医院检验科
出 处:《中国全科医学》2004年第17期1248-1249,共2页Chinese General Practice
摘 要:目的 探讨两种不同方法扫床对病房细菌数量变化的影响 ,为正确确定“大整理”和“小整理”时间提供理论依据。方法 对 10个病房“大整理”和“小整理”前、后空气和患者头面部皮肤及敷料表面细菌进行采样计数 ,并进行比较。结果 在“大整理”与“小整理”前、后 ,室内空气、患者头面部皮肤及敷料表面菌落数差异有显著性意义 ,室内空气与患者头面部皮肤及敷料表面菌落数呈正相关。结论 将“大整理”式扫床时间由上午改到下午有利于预防医院感染的发生。Objective To explore the effect of two bed sweeping methods on the changes of total bacterial count in sickrooms,in order to provide the theoretical evidence for confirming the timetable of 'big cleaning' and 'small cleaning'.Methods Germ quantities were examined and compared in sickroom air,in the face skins and the dressing surfaces of the patients before and after 'big cleaning' and 'small cleaning' respectively in ten sickrooms.Paired-samples test were applied to analyze the data using SPSS10.0 software.Results Germ quantities in sickroom air,on the faces and the dressings of the patients were significantly different between before and after 'big cleaning' or 'small cleaning'.There was a high positive correlation between the total bacterial quantity in sickroom air and that on the faces and the dressings of the patients.Conclusion Hospital infection would be prevented if the 'big cleaning' was arranged in the afternoon not in the morning.
关 键 词:病房 患者 敷料 头面部 皮肤 扫床 影响 量变 整理 结论
分 类 号:R197.39[医药卫生—卫生事业管理] G633[医药卫生—公共卫生与预防医学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.117