国际刑法中的“一事不二审”原则研究  

On the ne bis in idem of International Criminal Law

作　　者：王仲兴[1] 陈毅坚[2] 

机构地区：[1]中山大学法学院,广东广州510275 [2]中国人民大学法学院,北京100872

出　　处：《中山大学学报（社会科学版）》2004年第6期193-200,共8页Journal of Sun Yat-sen University(Social Science Edition)

摘　　要：该文通过对“一事不二审”原则的基本内涵及其在国际刑事法公约和司法审判实践领域里发展的分析,剖析了前南刑庭规约和规则在一事不二审原则及优先管辖权之间的悖论和不足,还从解释论的角度对国际刑事法院罗马规约在行为对象的范围、“诉讼程序”的涵义和对已经“审判”的理解上,质疑其存在的弊端,进而提出有效的分析思路和适当的解决方法。Ne bis in idem is an important principle of international law, which has greatly developed throughout international justice. This paper analyzes the concept of ne bis in idem and the development of this principle in international criminal convention and practice, especially the inconsistence between ne bis in idem and concurrent jurisdiction of ICTY statute and rules of procedure and evidence. Rome Statute of ICC came into being from the experience of ICTY. Based on detailed analysis on Article 20 and provisions about appeal and revision of conviction or sentence in statute and rules of procedure and evidence, it finds out defects of ICC in the range of the behavioral objects and the meaning of “proceeding” and “has been tried”, which lead to the effective and appropriate resolutions.

关 键 词：国际刑法 “一事不二审”原则 并行管辖权 诉讼程序 诉讼制度 国际刑事法院 

分 类 号：D997.9[政治法律—刑法学]